The Tom Selleck Thread

For discussions about the cast & crew, including guest stars

Moderator: Styles Bitchley

Message
Author
User avatar
T.Q.
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 1708
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:19 pm

Re: The Tom Selleck Thread

#916 Post by T.Q. »

Knocking my rubber chicken or my sloppy habits is within the rules, but you're attacking my character. I would like to think you don't mean that.

User avatar
nha trang
Vice Admiral
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 4:07 am

Re: The Tom Selleck Thread

#917 Post by nha trang »

Thanks guys

Luther's nephew - those are good points. I need to make another effort as a fan I really want Tom's autograph...

I never did get anything back but I had a lot of pictures and cards shoved into the envelope...I think the whole SASE thing got out of control.

I will make one more, albeit modest effort I suppose.

In other, non-related news, I see that according to the message entry window I am typing in "Styles can be applied quickly to selected text" Styles - post haste m'lad...lol j/k

nha trang

User avatar
Laohu
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 591
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 5:48 pm
Location: Freedonia

Re: The Tom Selleck Thread

#918 Post by Laohu »

Image
Look Tom has a poster up at Bailey's Antiques and Aloha Shirts. What a honor !

User avatar
T.Q.
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 1708
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:19 pm

Re: The Tom Selleck Thread

#919 Post by T.Q. »

Laohu wrote:Image
Look Tom has a poster up at Bailey's Antiques and Aloha Shirts. What a honor !
You soiled the Tom Selleck thread with a picture of Jay?

This is going way too far! :P

:geek:
Knocking my rubber chicken or my sloppy habits is within the rules, but you're attacking my character. I would like to think you don't mean that.

User avatar
K Hale
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 6:52 pm

Re: The Tom Selleck Thread

#920 Post by K Hale »

That’s what happens when you troll people; they start trolling back. :lol: Now I had to see that dude’s mug again! :o
I didn't realize you were so addicted to pool.
It's not pool.
Billiards.
Snooker!
Snucker.
SNOOKER!

User avatar
T.Q.
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 1708
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:19 pm

Re: The Tom Selleck Thread

#921 Post by T.Q. »

K Hale wrote:That’s what happens when you troll people; they start trolling back. :lol: Now I had to see that dude’s mug again! :o
Trolling is long over (hopefully for MiniMag fans soon too).

From the anger of the reboot announcement to first few episodes was plenty.

I'll make the odd joke (like the pic of Makua throwing a curse on the blessing thread) but I honestly don't care anymore.

Don't watch it. Don't care.

Life's too short.

My gifs of Jay days are over.
Knocking my rubber chicken or my sloppy habits is within the rules, but you're attacking my character. I would like to think you don't mean that.

User avatar
Higgins (aka Bondtoys)
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 607
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:04 pm

Re: The Tom Selleck Thread

#922 Post by Higgins (aka Bondtoys) »

Well, you have decided to start it, but it‘s not up to you to decide when it ends from the other side just because you don‘t enjoy it :roll:

Because you haven‘t asked that question at the first place ;)

But kudos to you admitting for having been trolling - finally

User avatar
T.Q.
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 1708
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:19 pm

Re: The Tom Selleck Thread

#923 Post by T.Q. »

Bondtoys.de wrote:Well, you have decided to start it, but it‘s not up to you to decide when it ends from the other side just because you don‘t enjoy it :roll:

Because you haven‘t asked that question at the first place ;)

But kudos to you admitting for having been trolling - finally
No.

I used the word "trolling" from your perspective.

I made funny gifs and jokes about little Jay for the other MM members who dislike the show and the idea of a reboot from the beginning.

The 2 or 3 member who like it were never the "target" really. I didn't make fun of Minimag just to "stick it to" the three people who have no taste. :P

So technically it wasn't trolling.

Just seemed like it to you and Laohu.

The majority here (I believe) have zero use for the reboot. Hence, when the majority of people on a Tom Selleck Magnum Magnum P.I site agree with you, you're not really a troll.
Knocking my rubber chicken or my sloppy habits is within the rules, but you're attacking my character. I would like to think you don't mean that.

User avatar
Higgins (aka Bondtoys)
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 607
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:04 pm

Re: The Tom Selleck Thread

#924 Post by Higgins (aka Bondtoys) »

T.Q. wrote:
K Hale wrote:That’s what happens when you troll people; they start trolling back. :lol: Now I had to see that dude’s mug again! :o
Trolling is long over (hopefully for MiniMag fans soon too).
Dude, just read what you wrote there and the context.
You admitted having been trolling, everything else is in the area of alternative facts :luther:

User avatar
T.Q.
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 1708
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:19 pm

Re: The Tom Selleck Thread

#925 Post by T.Q. »

Bondtoys.de wrote:
T.Q. wrote:
K Hale wrote:That’s what happens when you troll people; they start trolling back. :lol: Now I had to see that dude’s mug again! :o
Trolling is long over (hopefully for MiniMag fans soon too).
Dude, just read what you wrote there and the context.
You admitted having been trolling, everything else is in the area of alternative facts :luther:
It’s an expression.

One man’s posts is another man’s trolling.

Like I said, making fun of the show was not necessarily “trolling” you.

I was just having fun with other members who were also making fun of it.

Never once did I ever deliberately say “I gotta go on the Magnum Mania board” to specifically “troll” bondtoys or Laohu.

The show is wildly unpopular here. I think you’re in the minority.

You just got your knickers in a knot because you actually like Minimag.

Now it’s died down and no one cares so you don’t have to worry.

You can enjoy your substandard rip-off in peace now. :lol:
Knocking my rubber chicken or my sloppy habits is within the rules, but you're attacking my character. I would like to think you don't mean that.

User avatar
Higgins (aka Bondtoys)
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 607
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:04 pm

Re: The Tom Selleck Thread

#926 Post by Higgins (aka Bondtoys) »

Image

Mad Kudu Buck
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 414
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:02 pm

Re: The Tom Selleck Thread

#927 Post by Mad Kudu Buck »

Bondtoys.de wrote:Image
How ironic. I was thinking that exact thing when reading your posts.

User avatar
Higgins (aka Bondtoys)
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 607
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:04 pm

Re: The Tom Selleck Thread

#928 Post by Higgins (aka Bondtoys) »

So you want to tell us, that he did not admit that he was trolling?

User avatar
T.Q.
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 1708
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:19 pm

Re: The Tom Selleck Thread

#929 Post by T.Q. »

Ugh.

And back to Tom Selleck on the Tom Selleck thread.

Sandwich waterfall maybe a good place to start. :P

Image
Knocking my rubber chicken or my sloppy habits is within the rules, but you're attacking my character. I would like to think you don't mean that.

User avatar
T.Q.
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 1708
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:19 pm

Re: The Tom Selleck Thread

#930 Post by T.Q. »

If Tom Selleck had said yes to 'Indiana Jones'

Pretty good.

Looks a little weird.

:magnum:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GD5qDnk ... pp=desktop
Knocking my rubber chicken or my sloppy habits is within the rules, but you're attacking my character. I would like to think you don't mean that.

Post Reply