Jim "Mac" Bonnick
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 2:37 pm
Hi all,
As I said in my post in the "least favorite episodes" thread, I'm not a big fan of Jim Bonnick.
Whenever he enters the life of the four main characters, something almost ALWAYS goes wrong, and he ends up benefitting from it.
However, looking at Bonnick and the way he's written, there are actually some interesting corollaries if you read into the character and compare him to the original Mac, and to some extent, Magnum.
Case in point, Bonnick vs. original Mac.
Original Mac was always being conned by Magnum, wanted to play directly by the rules, but was always coerced into helping out and pretty much got nothing out of it except for donuts.
Bonnick is always conning Magnum and company for his own benefit, plays by no rules except his own and seems to come out the winner in the end, with Magnum and Co. getting nothing but lemons (See "The Love-For-Sale Boat").
Pretty much what you have is two characters that are mirror images of each other, but completely different personalities. Almost like the evil twin syndrome, or even "Bizzaro Mac" for those Seinfeld and Superman afficianados out there.
Plus you factor in the mustache vs. clean shaven, and you can get a South park reference out of that as well (i.e. Cleanshaven Cartman is evil, but goateed Cartman is good)
In tying in Magnum himself to all this, Magnum is always conning his friends for goods and services, so isn't it odd that the friend that he always conned the most (Mac) would have a doppelganger that would end up conning Magnum more than Magnum ever conned Mac.
I think the last episode of "Mac's Back" reflects that irony when the original Mac is laughing with Magnum, knowing that Magnum is going to get conned out of his mind.
Oh well, thats my 43 cents.
Anyone agree/disagree?
As I said in my post in the "least favorite episodes" thread, I'm not a big fan of Jim Bonnick.
Whenever he enters the life of the four main characters, something almost ALWAYS goes wrong, and he ends up benefitting from it.
However, looking at Bonnick and the way he's written, there are actually some interesting corollaries if you read into the character and compare him to the original Mac, and to some extent, Magnum.
Case in point, Bonnick vs. original Mac.
Original Mac was always being conned by Magnum, wanted to play directly by the rules, but was always coerced into helping out and pretty much got nothing out of it except for donuts.
Bonnick is always conning Magnum and company for his own benefit, plays by no rules except his own and seems to come out the winner in the end, with Magnum and Co. getting nothing but lemons (See "The Love-For-Sale Boat").
Pretty much what you have is two characters that are mirror images of each other, but completely different personalities. Almost like the evil twin syndrome, or even "Bizzaro Mac" for those Seinfeld and Superman afficianados out there.
Plus you factor in the mustache vs. clean shaven, and you can get a South park reference out of that as well (i.e. Cleanshaven Cartman is evil, but goateed Cartman is good)
In tying in Magnum himself to all this, Magnum is always conning his friends for goods and services, so isn't it odd that the friend that he always conned the most (Mac) would have a doppelganger that would end up conning Magnum more than Magnum ever conned Mac.
I think the last episode of "Mac's Back" reflects that irony when the original Mac is laughing with Magnum, knowing that Magnum is going to get conned out of his mind.
Oh well, thats my 43 cents.
Anyone agree/disagree?