Luther's nephew Dobie wrote:
Danny Lin wrote:
Not sure I should bring this up but since we have so many critique experts that point out the most intricate details I thought some may appreciate my latest encounter. So........... I did this for you.
During the opening 3 minutes of this EPISODE, LEST WE FORGET, there is a Beach Scene at Night, on a blanket that is a flashback to the eve of the Pearl Harbor attack. There is a guy and girl necking, kissing only, and they go from the ground to standing up. If you look closely, the guy has a full ERECTION inside his shorts as he is standing upright. I kid you not. Before you criticize my post, go view it for yourself and view it in slow motion and you will see for yourself.
According to the credits I have, it is the actor by the name of Miguel Ferrer [episode character name: Ensign Robert 'Bobby' Wickes (1941)]. It could be a substitute fill in but I doubt it, I think he just got aroused and the director ignored it.
Keep in mind I did not look for this bulge in the guy's pants, but it shocked me the director would include this footage thinking the public would not recognize it, likely because it was a nighttime scene.
How disgusting, I thought this was a clean show.
Nevertheless, I enjoyed this episode.
I´m sorry but this post is rubbish in any respect...
Hi Danny Lin,
I'm a little confused, was Sisophous's post on this thread, I didn't see it here, or did I somehow miss it? But to the point, I don't think it's fair to criticize the director/editors for missing the bit actor's excited state, they would have been focused on making sure that particular shot advanced the story and was up to snuff quality wise.
However with the advance of technology the average schnook at home can catch things that weren't noticeable in the past. One of Imus's staff members on his radio show said people from President Kennedy(in a bathing suit) in a home movie shown on tv to Joe Flynn in his shorts on McHale's Navy had their wedding tackle exposed, when the shot was slowed down to frame by frame. My reaction to that is yeeecch, unless you are a Joe Flynn groupie(how many females could there be in that club?). In any event as hobbies go perhaps they'd be better off train spotting rather than naughty bits spotting.
Hi, Luther´s Nephew Dobie!
Yupp, Im afraid, you missed it. It was posted on this thread on Friday, Aug 31, 2012, 2:29 am (page 6, 5th post).
Well, there comes someone, using the slow motion to find something nobody would see without the use of slow motion and nobody would be searching for... Then they claim to have found what they were looking for. Then they claim to not have been "looking for this bulge in the guy´s pants", pretending to have found it by accident and finally they come up, commenting: "How disgusting, I thought this was a clean show." !!!??!!!!!AS IF THIS WAS NOT A TOTALLY "CLEAN" SHOW !!!!!
That post was made in 2012. Since the 90ies everyone finds ANY thinkable sexual content on the internet! Since back then every twelve year old on the planet has seen ANYTHING about sex totally free and at no cost accessible on the web but here comes someone popping up directly from the stone age, giving ridiculous comments about one of the most entertaining TV shows ever made and drags it into the "dirt"!
As if sex wasn´t a part of life as much as eating and sleeping is... On what planet do they live?! That that person claims to be from New York and not even from the bible belt doesn´t make things better.
And finally: Wanting to know if there is anything behind this post, I certainly took my time to check!
And...? Aaaaaand... ? Yah, exactly: There´s just simply nothing to find! At all!
That sequence is in fact totally "clean"!!
Here´s the mission to anyone on the forum: If someone finds that bulge, screenshot and share it! I´m pretty sure that we all would survive that, wouldn´t we?
And even if it was there: Times of ridiculous prudery ARE OVER!!
...Give me a break...