Page 1 of 2

Re: Tom wants to be Magnum again?

Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 3:25 am
by Doc Ibold
Magnum N.I. wrote:Yes he does, and that's what's holding up the production. Nobody wants him, but they can't make the film without his approval. I don't think he has any legal claim, but the studio fears any bad publicity if he isn't happy. The reason they don't want him is probably because his agent will demand an exorbitant salary for his client and the movie would have to be the highest grossing film of all time for the studio to make what they feel would be an acceptable profit for them. I suspect that's the reason that Quentin Tarantino has cancelled his plans for making Kill Bill III in 2014. Uma agreed to do the film, but probably only in principal. Her agent no doubt demanded a fortune. Bear in mind, that Tarantino only paid David Carradine $250K for both Kill Bill I & II combined. Read "The Kill Bill Diary," by David Carradine.
I would suspect the reason would be that there is a major problem with finding a suitable script that does justice to the series and what it stood for. You can take it the purely comedic route and have Ben Stiller as Rick, Magnum be a one dimensional womanizer and have whomever plays Higgins as a complete jerk who stands in Magnums way. Or you could take it the super gritty route which ignores several humorous aspects of the show that made it what it was. The truth would have to lie somewhere in the middle.

I'm with Conch in that a TV movie would probably be the best route in terms of character exposition. I don't see that happening due to some comments from TS saying he DIDN'T want that to happen. (I may be wrong on that last part)

Last I heard, the guy who did Dodgeball (while a funny movie) was set to helm Big Screen Magnum. Treating it in that vein would be a disaster, and it would turn into a farce.

I think Magnum has a strong enough fan base that if the movie isn't done properly, there will be a bigger backlash than anything TS could say.. And to that point I think he realizes that moreso than the size of the payday. Plus the fact that he treats Magnum more as a reputation than a role.

Just my two cents.

Re: Tom wants to be Magnum again?

Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 3:27 am
by Stelth
I would be happy with just a one-off TV movie. A few would be even better.

Re: Tom wants to be Magnum again?

Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 4:06 am
by 308GUY
Stelth wrote:I would be happy with just a one-off TV movie. A few would be even better.

Agreed.

The possibilities are virtually endless, but unless handled in the proper manor, could be a train wreck going somewhere to happen.

I don't think if any of the original cast members were even remotely invlolved, they'd ever let that happen though.

Re: Tom wants to be Magnum again?

Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 4:34 am
by Magnum N.I.
Doc Ibold wrote:
Magnum N.I. wrote:Yes he does, and that's what's holding up the production. Nobody wants him, but they can't make the film without his approval. I don't think he has any legal claim, but the studio fears any bad publicity if he isn't happy. The reason they don't want him is probably because his agent will demand an exorbitant salary for his client and the movie would have to be the highest grossing film of all time for the studio to make what they feel would be an acceptable profit for them. I suspect that's the reason that Quentin Tarantino has cancelled his plans for making Kill Bill III in 2014. Uma agreed to do the film, but probably only in principal. Her agent no doubt demanded a fortune. Bear in mind, that Tarantino only paid David Carradine $250K for both Kill Bill I & II combined. Read "The Kill Bill Diary," by David Carradine.
I would suspect the reason would be that there is a major problem with finding a suitable script that does justice to the series and what it stood for. You can take it the purely comedic route and have Ben Stiller as Rick, Magnum be a one dimensional womanizer and have whomever plays Higgins as a complete jerk who stands in Magnums way. Or you could take it the super gritty route which ignores several humorous aspects of the show that made it what it was. The truth would have to lie somewhere in the middle.

I'm with Conch in that a TV movie would probably be the best route in terms of character exposition. I don't see that happening due to some comments from TS saying he DIDN'T want that to happen. (I may be wrong on that last part)

Last I heard, the guy who did Dodgeball (while a funny movie) was set to helm Big Screen Magnum. Treating it in that vein would be a disaster, and it would turn into a farce.

I think Magnum has a strong enough fan base that if the movie isn't done properly, there will be a bigger backlash than anything TS could say.. And to that point I think he realizes that moreso than the size of the payday. Plus the fact that he treats Magnum more as a reputation than a role.

Just my two cents.
The gate keepers won't even look at my script.

Re: Tom wants to be Magnum again?

Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 4:47 am
by Stelth
I HATE the Dragnet, Starsky & Hutch, A-Team, Charlie's Angels-type movie adaptations. They all sucked. It would be awful if Magnum P.I. received that kind of treatment.

Re: Tom wants to be Magnum again?

Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 4:52 am
by Doc Ibold
Stelth wrote:I HATE the Dragnet, Starsky & Hutch, A-Team, Charlie's Angels-type movie adaptations. They all sucked. It would be awful if Magnum P.I. received that kind of treatment.
That's my #1 fear. I mean, I laughed at S & H, but it was more of a spoof than a true homage. Charlie's Angels was a little different becuause it wasn't trying to take itself seriously, ala the A Team.

Re: Tom wants to be Magnum again?

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:05 am
by Luther's nephew Dobie
Stelth wrote:I would be happy with just a one-off TV movie. A few would be even better.
Hi Stelth,
The Rockford Files did that with a older James Garner and they turned out pretty well, though a paunchy Garner was really showing his age by then. Selleck is in much better shape.
An aside - at the National Firearms Museum they have a few Selleck donated guns plus 2 or 3 Magnum pistols Selleck had commisioned. I havent seen all the threads yet so I don't know if this has been brought up. I tried putting the link here but it won't work, but if you go to their online site and write 'sellecks guns" it will pop right up.
I am going to put the image of one of the pistols below, I hope it works and the image is here. Anyway, well worth checking out, it's a beaut weapon:

Re: Tom wants to be Magnum again?

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:20 am
by Sam
Hi LnD,

Here is a gun thread from 2009.

http://magnum-mania.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1470

Re: Tom wants to be Magnum again?

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 3:52 am
by Luther's nephew Dobie
Sam wrote:Hi LnD,

Here is a gun thread from 2009.

http://magnum-mania.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1470
Hi Sam,
Thank you for the heads up.
Mike


"May you live to be 100 years old and the last voice you hear is mine"
Irish Toast

Re: Tom wants to be Magnum again?

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:16 am
by Magnum N.I.
false alarm

Re: Tom wants to be Magnum again?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 1:56 am
by marlboro
Image

Re: Tom wants to be Magnum again?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 4:05 am
by ConchRepublican
Magnum N.I. wrote:Yes he does, and that's what's holding up the production. Nobody wants him, but they can't make the film without his approval. I don't think he has any legal claim, but the studio fears any bad publicity if he isn't happy. The reason they don't want him is probably because his agent will demand an exorbitant salary for his client and the movie would have to be the highest grossing film of all time for the studio to make what they feel would be an acceptable profit for them. I suspect that's the reason that Quentin Tarantino has cancelled his plans for making Kill Bill III in 2014. Uma agreed to do the film, but probably only in principal. Her agent no doubt demanded a fortune. Bear in mind, that Tarantino only paid David Carradine $250K for both Kill Bill I & II combined. Read "The Kill Bill Diary," by David Carradine.
Who else was paying David Carradine anything?

I got the sense it was a bit of a pity/hero casting ...

Re: Tom wants to be Magnum again?

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 4:06 am
by ConchRepublican
marlboro wrote:Image
That's .......disturbing ......

Re: Tom wants to be Magnum again?

Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2015 8:19 am
by Magnum's moustache
Stelth wrote:I HATE the Dragnet, Starsky & Hutch, A-Team, Charlie's Angels-type movie adaptations. They all sucked. It would be awful if Magnum P.I. received that kind of treatment.
Totally agree on this. I think the movie would be very very disappointing.

Re: Tom wants to be Magnum again?

Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 6:31 am
by Luther's nephew Dobie
Magnum's moustache wrote:
Stelth wrote:I HATE the Dragnet, Starsky & Hutch, A-Team, Charlie's Angels-type movie adaptations. They all sucked. It would be awful if Magnum P.I. received that kind of treatment.
Totally agree on this. I think the movie would be very very disappointing.
Hi Guys,
I generally agree with the above, though I have to disagree in regards to the 3 Dragnet movies. The 1954 Dragnet is a pretty darn good flick, with Jack Webb as Friday and Ben Alexander as his partner. The late 1960's version with Webb and Harry Morgan wasn't bad at all, though I'm not sure if it was a tv movie or theatrical release.
The Tom Hanks 1987 Dragnet is a send up that for the first hour is a lot of fun but then loses its way.
Another tv series to film effort that worked well was The Fugitive, also The Addams Family.
McHales Navy spawned 2 post series films that were pretty funny, though mostly with the original cast which would not be the case with a Magnum movie.